home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: Jim Rosenfield <jnr@igc.apc.org>
- Newsgroups: talk.politics.drugs
- Subject: Legalization, Cruel Hoax? NYT
- Message-ID: <APC&1'0'58740e5a'39b@igc.apc.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 1995 14:14:27 -0800 (PST)
-
- On My Mind
- A. M. ROSENTHAL
- The Cruelest Hoax
- (NY Times Op-Ed Page, Jan. 3, 1994)
-
- The campaign for drug legalization grows in wallet and prestige.
- But, as it picks up Journalistic and academic endorsement and
- foundation money. one thing stays constant. It remains now, as it
- always been, one of the most cruel and selfish movements in
- America.
-
- The great majority of Americans are against legalization. So ate
- the politicians they elect to office.
-
- And Americans who believe in using government power and public
- opinion to fight narcotics are drowsily inclined to believe that to
- pay attention to the legalization movement would strengthen It. so
- let's not.
-
- While we slumber, the movement becomes respectable. The Soros
- foundation recently gave pro-legalIzers at least $6 million, to
- study legalization and decriminalization.
-
- Meanwhile, the struggle against drugs is long and wearying.
- Achievement does not always hold steady. People who say they have
- a cheap and fast solution get a bearing their logic would never
- earn them.
-
- Far more important, it is clear that the legalizers can make
- important headway without passing laws. They strive to weaken the
- essential national resolve that the drug war must be fought with as
- many weapons and for as long as It takes.
-
- This is backdoor drug acceptance, almost as dangerous as
- legalization. The U.S. is still paying in broken lives, fear,
- violence and damaged newborn for the tacit decriminalization won by
- the counterculture in the 60's.
-
- Last month the University of Michigan lnstitute for Social Research
- reported that illegal drug use among secondary school students is
- rising. The study traced an expansion of drug use among young
- people into the late 1970's, a decline through 1991 and since then
- a resurgence.
-
- The warning from the study group was that as children heard less
- disapproval and more glamorization or approval of drugs. their own
- use went up. You don't really need a law.
-
- It is time to state the truth, as often as the message is heard in
- the academy. the press, the movies or TV. The legalization movement
- is cruel because it would create more addicts, more abused
- children, more victims of muggings and robbery, millions more every
- single year.
-
- It is selfish because it wou14 move the entire burden of fighting
- drugs from the totality of society to neighborhoods that already
- suffer most. It is both cruel and selfish because it glides over
- the ruined lives of those who abuse drugs, legally or not.
-
- The movement claims that legalization would drive drug mobsters out
- of business, which would cut down on crime so us nonaddicts could
- live in peace. But nobody has demonstrated how it would reduce
- crime or addiction, because it will not.
-
- Mayor Rudolph Giullani and the New York police have shown the way
- at least to cut down on drug-mob shootings. Go after them, arrest
- gunners, pushers and their customers; don't look away, put them
- away.
-
- The police have done their Job well enough in Washington Heights to
- force the mobsters indoors. That cuts down on street
- assassinations.
-
- But it has not cut down on drug abuse, or on crimes by addicts.
- Most drug crimes are not carried out by addicts frantic for drug
- buying money, but after and because of drug use, by addicts who
- take to cold-blooded crime as the only way drugs leave them fit to
- make a living.
-
- If legalization made drugs purchasable without penalty - or gave
- them away - there would be more addicts, therefore more crime. That
- is the root hoax of legalization.
-
- To fight drugs and drug crime takes a combination of interdiction
- at home and abroad, well funded drug therapy and a resolute anti-
- drug national consensus enforced by tough, constant parent, police
- and neighborhood pressure. A combination.
-
- Americans who support legalization are not looking for an up or
- down vote. They know they could never win. But they also know,
- because America has seen it happen that if the public stops caring
- about cenforcing the drug laws, that is just as good as taking them
- off the books, and a lot less trouble.
-
- Americans who support drug legalization or decriminalization may be
- otherwise decent people. But to the extent they succeed they are
- responsible for what is wrought, even though they be lovely to
- their own children and house plants, whether They contribute one
- dollar or six million, in coin or embrace.
-
-
-